I bought a pair of Puma kids' athletic shoes from a shoe store. In a mere two months, the soles of the shoes I purchased for a considerable sum suffered damage. The store sent them to Puma for inspection, and the response I received yesterday indicated that it was due to a mistake on the user's part. It's surprising how a 9-year-old child can do so much damage to the sole of a shoe.
Puma's quality and dedication have noticeably declined.
One shoe I bought from Puma has now become the following after wearing it for an average of two weeks. Look, this shoe on the upper side, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, this shoe, the leather on the upper side has lifted and there is a piece u...
On April 17, 2025, we purchased FILA 1833-3007 sneakers from the Deichmann Viaport Kurtköy store. My 9-year-old son used them at school during his 4th grade year, and he wore them for a total of no more than 20 days. However, the shoes were severely damaged and fell apart within a month. On May 18, ...
The Puma brand sports shoes were sold with a warranty, but within two months, the inner fabric of the shoes tore apart. I always used them with care and only for light daily walking, so there was no misuse on my part. When I sent them in for an exchange, my request was rejected on the grounds that t...
Recently, I purchased a pair of shoes from Puma, believing I was selecting a trustworthy brand. Regrettably, the shoes began to deteriorate almost immediately, and I was shocked by what I witnessed. I had confidence in Puma, anticipating a specific standard of quality, but that confidence has eviden...
I purchased a pair of FILA model 1833-3007 sneakers for my 9-year-old son on April 17, 2025, from the Deichmann Viaport Kurtköy store. My son only wore them to school for about 20 days in total, yet the shoes started falling apart and showed extreme wear and tear in less than a month. On May 18, 20...
Comments