The Puma brand sports shoes were sold with a warranty, but within two months, the inner fabric of the shoes tore apart. I always used them with care and only for light daily walking, so there was no misuse on my part. When I sent them in for an exchange, my request was rejected on the grounds that the issue was not caused by the company. I even provided photos clearly showing the defect, yet they still refused to take responsibility. Even shoes sold at a quarter of the price rarely experience such defects, and when they do, sellers usually provide compensation. However, Puma is causing its customers to suffer by refusing to acknowledge that it is selling poor-quality products at high prices.
I bought Puma brand shoes about 1 year ago, I used them for about 8 months for only 3-4 hours a day. As can be seen from the picture, there are no impacts or defects on the shoes. However, the lining on both sides of the heel inner part has torn. When I went to the place where I bought them, I was t...
I purchased a pair of Under Armour shoes, expecting durability and quality. However, in less than six months, the inner lining tore, the edges started coming apart, and the toe area began to separate. This level of wear in such a short time is completely unacceptable. I sent the shoes in for inspec...
I bought a pair of Puma sports shoes for $58 from the Sporjinal store located in Kırıkkale Merkez Podium Mall. I used the product daily for about three months, but within this short period, the front part of the shoes started to tear. After the issue occurred, I went to the store and requested a re...
After barely two wears, a big opening emerged on the side of one of the shoes...that just puzzled me big time when I saw it...Puma is meant to be a well-known and high-quality brand, but here I am, feeling as if I've wasted my money away. This is not the way it should be! It's inexcusable that a pa...
Comments