Daikin SENSIRA AC - Unexplained Fin Damage & Refused Part Replacement

Daikin SENSIRA AC - Unexplained Fin Damage & Refused Part Replacement
Daikin SENSIRA AC - Unexplained Fin Damage & Refused Part Replacement
Daikin SENSIRA AC - Unexplained Fin Damage & Refused Part Replacement
Daikin SENSIRA AC - Unexplained Fin Damage & Refused Part Replacement
Murat
June 19, 11:53 am
15

Dear Sir/Madam, We have been using the DAIKIN SENSIRA 12000 BTU/H – FTXF35E INVERTER AIR CONDITIONER R32 model in our home, and we have recently noticed deformations on the aluminum heat exchanger (fins) located just behind the protective panel of the indoor unit, without any external intervention. My wife and I use the device very carefully and strictly follow the instructions in the user manual. There has been no impact, physical contact, or improper handling of the unit at any time. However, as can be clearly seen in the attached photos, a localized and irregular deformation has occurred, which is difficult to explain. During my initial contact with the authorized service team, I was informed that the cause of this deformation could not be clearly identified and that it does not pose a risk for continued use. However, climate control specialists I have consulted suggested that this situation could result from expansion due to freezing and thawing, manufacturing stress deformation, or an internal structural issue. They also emphasized that the aluminum fins are specifically designed to optimize airflow and improve heating/cooling performance, and any deformation in this area could lead to airflow irregularities, localized performance losses, increased energy consumption, and even condensation drainage problems in the indoor unit. Therefore, I request that this issue be addressed under warranty, and instead of attempting to correct the fins with a fin comb, I request a replacement of the affected part to restore the unit to its original, factory condition. As a customer who purchased this unit brand new on July 10, 2024, and has used it for less than a year, I strongly refuse to continue using a product that has lost its original structural integrity. It is disappointing to learn that my request for part replacement has been denied by Daikin and that only a fin comb adjustment was offered. As a leading brand in the HVAC industry, I trust that Daikin values customer satisfaction, and I kindly request that my case be urgently re-evaluated and that I be contacted as soon as possible. Attached are the relevant photographs of the issue. Kind regards, Murat S*** P***

profile-icon
To be able to comment, or .

Comments

Be the first to comment

Q&A: Explore Popular Queries

Check out the solutions and tips on this topic.

Similar Complaints

1
Oğuzhan is completely dissatisfied with the result

Daikin D2CNL024A1AATR Keeps Giving 1167 Error and the Company Won't Stand Behind It

Oğuzhan
February 16, 1:34 pm
32
Daikin D2CNL024A1AATR Keeps Giving 1167 Error and the Company Won't Stand Behind It
1
Mehmet is completely dissatisfied with the result

Daikin Sensira 12000 BTU FTXF35F Not Working After 3 Weeks of Installation

Mehmet
August 14, 11:49 am
27
1
Erkan is completely dissatisfied with the result

My Daikin Siesta AC Saga - More Than Double the Price, Double the Problems

Erkan
August 23, 2023 8:35 pm
88
My Daikin Siesta AC Saga - More Than Double the Price, Double the Problems
My Daikin Siesta AC Saga - More Than Double the Price, Double the Problems
+5

Persistent Issues with Beko 15,000 BTU Air Conditioner

Aysel
August 10, 2023 2:12 pm
57
2
Selen is not satisfied with the result

Arçelik 361B Oven Not Replaced Despite Being Faulty

December 30, 2023 3:34 pm
20
Arçelik 361B Oven Not Replaced Despite Being Faulty
Arçelik 361B Oven Not Replaced Despite Being Faulty
Arçelik 361B Oven Not Replaced Despite Being Faulty
Report a Similar Issue