I Face Chery Omoda 5 Service Price Surge From $253 to $588 in One Year

156

My Chery Omoda 5 currently has 9,700 km, and I need to complete its second scheduled maintenance on April 17. On April 4, 2026, I called the authorized Chery Tan Oto service in Yenimahalle, Ankara to get a price quote. They told me the maintenance would cost $563 and that the spark plugs would also be replaced. Since my vehicle is only at 9,700 km, I asked why the spark plugs needed replacement, and they insisted that it is mandatory during the second service.

After this, I contacted Chery headquarters and explained the situation. They later called me back and said there had been a misunderstanding and that only a brake fluid check would be performed. I made it clear that I understand vehicles and knew exactly what they initially meant. When I asked the headquarters again about the price, they said there would be no change and that they could not intervene in pricing, so the $563 fee remained the same.

Since my car is still under warranty, I am forced to use an authorized service center. Afterward, I started researching prices. I shared my situation in a Chery Omoda Turkey Facebook group, where another user gave me a Jaecoo service contact and said they had paid $344 for the exact same maintenance very recently. I still have the messages as proof.

In my opinion, the fact that maintenance costs have more than doubled within a year, along with huge price differences between authorized service centers, is a misleading pricing strategy aimed at consumers. Last year, I paid $253 for the same service, while this year I am being charged $588, which represents nearly a 130% increase. Even minimum wage has not increased at this rate, yet a basic car service fee is approaching a worker’s monthly salary. This is both unethical and a violation of consumer rights.

Charging such excessive amounts for standard procedures like oil, oil filter, and cabin filter replacements—just to maintain warranty coverage—is unacceptable. The fact that there is only one authorized Chery service center in Turkey’s capital effectively creates a monopoly, allowing them to charge whatever they want without competition.

Due to this inconsistent and excessive pricing, I demand that my grievance be resolved, that the second maintenance fee be reduced to a fair and market-appropriate level, and that a transparent, standardized, and regulated pricing policy be urgently implemented across all authorized service centers.

Comments

Similar Complaints

Chery Omada 5 Service Problem

On 31.12.2025, I left my Chery Omoda 5 vehicle at Bursa Gönye Otomotiv Yalova Yolu service for repair. When I delivered ...

Chery Omoda 5 Pro Stuck at Authorized Service for 27 Days Without Repairs

"My Chery Omoda 5 Pro was involved in an accident on 29.12.2025 and was taken to the authorized service center of Adnan Automotive in Trabzon. Despite a long time having passed, no clear start has been made regarding the repair of my vehicle, and uncertainty about the parts order and repair process still persists. So far I have spoken with the dealer in Trabzon about ten times and have had numerous phone calls with Chery Turkey, yet I have not been given a definite date, concrete progress, or explanation. I have not received clear and reassuring information especially about the parts supply process. I am told that the parts have been on order for about 38 days, but no definitive information is provided about when the repair will start or when the car will be delivered. I have been unable to use my car for a long time and am suffering as a result. I demand that the repair process for my vehicle be clarified urgently, that the expected parts be obtained quickly, and that the repair be completed as soon as possible with the delivery date clearly communicated to me. I also request the necessary support to compensate for the hardship caused by this lengthy process. Because of this uncertainty and delays in the current parts supply process, I want to emphasize that prospective buyers of Chery vehicles should consider the risk of not seeing their cars for an extended period in the event of an accident."