My Royal Canin Sterilized 37 Arrived in Different Bag Than Market Standard

My Royal Canin Sterilized 37 Arrived in Different Bag Than Market Standard
My Royal Canin Sterilized 37 Arrived in Different Bag Than Market Standard
profile
November 24, 2025 10:59 am
-

On November 11, I purchased a 15 kg bag of Royal Canin Sterilized 37 dry food. Seller was extremely attentive and meticulous at every stage of the purchase, including invoicing and order tracking. For this reason, I believe the issue is not with the seller but with Royal Canin’s packaging practices.

When the product arrived, I noticed major differences between the packaging I received and the packaging I previously knew as original. The top of the bag was not sealed in the usual way, like a classic heat-sealed doypack. Instead, it had a stitched (sewn) top, and the inner surface of the bag had a papery, double-layered texture. This made me seriously question whether the product was in its original packaging or repackaged later. The stitched top also raised concerns about air exposure, and I believe premium pet food should not be treated like a basic feed sack.

Because of these concerns, I contacted Royal Canin directly. They stated that the product was original; however, I do not believe a verbal statement alone is sufficient—especially when there is a clear, visible difference in packaging. When I checked the same product on Amazon, I saw the original-style sealed packaging: a fully heat-sealed, closed top, exactly as I’m familiar with. This further strengthened my suspicion that the stitched-top, papery-lined packaging I received is nonstandard. Because of this, I returned the product to the seller.

I request a clear, written explanation from Royal Canin regarding the reason for this different packaging type, through which channel this product was packaged, and what concrete evidence confirms its authenticity. Large pet food bags with stitched tops and papery inner layers should at minimum be classified as “open-bag” products and sold transparently without misleading the customer. Otherwise, it creates a significant trust issue. I expect a more transparent, verifiable, and standardized approach to packaging.

profile-icon
To be able to comment, or .

Comments

Be the first to comment

Similar Complaints

Royal Canin Hepatic Dog Food Missing Reseal

profile
March 09, 2024 9:40 am
9
1
Gözde is completely dissatisfied with the result

Foreign Object Found in 15kg Royal Canin Sterilized Cat Food

profile
October 11, 2024 8:28 pm
16
Foreign Object Found in 15kg Royal Canin Sterilized Cat Food
Foreign Object Found in 15kg Royal Canin Sterilized Cat Food
Foreign Object Found in 15kg Royal Canin Sterilized Cat Food
Foreign Object Found in 15kg Royal Canin Sterilized Cat Food
3
Sacide found the result inadequate

Royal Canin Sterilised 10kg Cat Food Seemed Fake—Cats Refused to Eat It

profile
January 20, 2025 5:17 pm
47
Royal Canin Sterilised 10kg Cat Food Seemed Fake—Cats Refused to Eat It
Royal Canin Sterilised 10kg Cat Food Seemed Fake—Cats Refused to Eat It
Report a Similar Issue