Nike P-6000 Sole Separation After Less Than Two Months Of Use

Nike P-6000 Sole Separation After Less Than Two Months Of Use
Nike P-6000 Sole Separation After Less Than Two Months Of Use
47

I purchased two pairs of Nike P-6000 shoes from Barçın Spor at Meydan AVM in Türkiye on January 15, 2026, and paid a total of ₺12,199.80. Because I work full-time and use separate work shoes during working hours, I did not use the Nike shoes regularly. In total, I wore them for less than one and a half months. Despite this limited and normal use, on May 7, 2026, the sole of the right shoe of one pair started to separate from the upper. I am convinced that this problem is not caused by misuse or user error, and I do not find it acceptable that a product in this price range experiences such a defect in such a short time. I submitted the defective product for inspection under case number SSS115040. Later, I received an SMS informing me that my claim had been rejected, but no technical explanation or detailed reason was provided regarding the decision. I find it disappointing that a premium Nike product failed this quickly and that my complaint was dismissed without a clear and transparent justification. I have photographs clearly showing the defect, as well as the inspection documents and related correspondence. I do not accept the inspection result because I believe the defect stems from a manufacturing or material issue rather than user error. I am requesting either a replacement of the defective pair with a new one or a full refund for the defective pair. I kindly ask Nike and the retailer to take responsibility and provide a fair resolution for this product, which did not meet reasonable durability expectations.

Muhammed
June 11 8:28 AM

I bought my shoes on January 15, 2026, from Barçın Spor Meydan Mall, and within a month and a half the sole of my right foot developed a split. I sent the product for inspection, the process was started under number SSS115040, and the negative result was communicated via SMS, but no detailed explanation was provided. I have not yet received any response to my replacement request from Nike, and this situation has left me disappointed.

Muhammed
June 12 8:03 PM

The right sole of my Nike P-6000 shoes separated within just one and a half months of purchase. I bought the product from Barçın Spor and submitted it for inspection under case number 115040. My claim was rejected after the inspection, but I was not provided with a detailed explanation for the rejection. I find this approach unsatisfactory. Given that such a problem occurred within a very short period of use, I request that the shoes be replaced with a new pair.

Comments

Similar Complaints

Nike Air Plus Shoes Fell Apart in 3 Months, Refund Denied

109

I purchased Nike Air Plus sneakers on July 28, 2024, but within just three months, both shoes began falling apart. The t...

Nike Air Plus Shoes Fell Apart in 3 Months, Refund Denied
Nike Air Plus Shoes Fell Apart in 3 Months, Refund Denied
Nike Air Plus Shoes Fell Apart in 3 Months, Refund Denied
Nike Air Plus Shoes Fell Apart in 3 Months, Refund Denied
+1

Nike Air Force 1 ’07 Worn Out In 7 Months, Exchange Request Rejected

74

I purchased the Nike Air Force 1 ’07 White Black model sneakers from the Nike store at Meydan Istanbul in March or April...

My Nike Air Max 270 Heel Ripped Quickly and Nike Ignored the Real Issue

64

I purchased a pair of Nike Air Max 270 sneakers from the Nike store at Antalya Terracity on March 23, 2025. I wore them ...

Nike Mercurial Zoom Vapor 16 Pro Studs Broke After Few Uses, Claim Denied

78

On April 4, 2024, I purchased the Nike Mercurial Zoom Vapor 16 Pro FG cleats for 7,200 TL from the Barçın Nike store in ...

Nike Jordan FQ8162-142 Shoe Defective After One Month

34

On September 22, 2024, I purchased a pair of Nike Jordan (FQ8162-142-6.5Y) from the Nike store in Acity Ankara. After on...

Nike Jordan FQ8162-142 Shoe Defective After One Month