I bought a new pair of Skechers shoes last year, but they started to crack before completing their first year of use. I requested an examination, but Skechers determined that it was not a production fault. This decision feels like an excuse to avoid taking responsibility for their defective product. As a loyal customer, I expected better service and a solution that reflects the brand's reputation. What kind of solution is this? Does Skechers expect its customers not to walk in their shoes(!)? This is a shameful situation for such a reputable brand. I want my shoes replaced or my money refunded at the current price because I paid around ₺4,000 at the time, but now the same shoes cost around ₺6,000.
I bought a pair of Skechers shoes just three months ago, and both sides have split open—each tear is about 4-5 cm long. I only wear them for everyday use at school and in cafés, so there’s been no excessive strain. Despite this, the shoes completely fell apart in record time. I paid ₺3,000-₺4,000 ex...
I bought a pair of Skechers boots from their official website, expecting durability after paying ₺X,000. Yet, in less than four months, the sides started tearing apart! I sent them in for inspection, only to receive the usual “not a manufacturing defect” excuse. How can a supposedly high-quality pro...
I recently purchased a pair of Skechers shoes, and after wearing them just around ten times, they began to show signs of tearing. I returned them expecting a straightforward process since they were still under warranty, but I was informed that the shoes weren't defective and that the damage was my r...
I bought a pair of Skechers shoes and was honestly expecting durability and comfort based on all the positive feedback I had heard. Unfortunately, within just 2 months, the shoes began to wear out visibly, especially around the mesh areas, despite the fact that I never even washed them. I paid ₺250...
Comments