I recently purchased a pair of Skechers shoes, and after wearing them just around ten times, they began to show signs of tearing. I returned them expecting a straightforward process since they were still under warranty, but I was informed that the shoes weren't defective and that the damage was my responsibility. Honestly, that response really disappointed me because I picked this brand anticipating a certain standard of durability and attention. Spending ₺6,000 on a pair of shoes that barely withstands regular use leaves me questioning the reliability of the product. I expected a reasonable solution, but now I’m stuck with unusable shoes and a service that doesn’t support the brand.
I bought a new pair of Skechers shoes last year, but they started to crack before completing their first year of use. I requested an examination, but Skechers determined that it was not a production fault. This decision feels like an excuse to avoid taking responsibility for their defective product....
The shoes I bought from the Skechers store started tearing at the sides and developed an unpleasant appearance within just 4–5 months. Despite applying for a replacement, my request was rejected. Even though the shoes are under a 2-year warranty, no action has been taken. I paid ₺6,300 for these sho...
My experience with Skechers has been very frustrating. I bought a pair of men's sports shoes only six months ago, but the inner lining has already worn out and opened up. When I sent them to be checked, all I got back was a note saying there was no problem with how they were made. How can they blame...
I bought a pair of Skechers shoes after seeing some recommendations, but they began to fall apart within just two months of use. I noticed considerable wear on the heel lining, leading me to doubt the quality of the materials utilised. When I returned the shoes for a refund or exchange, the brand re...
Comments