Reebok Warranty Denied! Month-Old Glide Unisex Shoes Rip

Reebok Warranty Denied! Month-Old Glide Unisex Shoes Rip
Reebok Warranty Denied! Month-Old Glide Unisex Shoes Rip
52

I bought a pair of Reebok Glide Unisex Black sneakers for everyday use. Merely a month post-purchase, the top section of the shoe ripped. I sent the shoes for repair under warranty and paid a total of ₺500 for shipping costs. Yet, the service center declined the shoes and sent them back to me. I spent ₺2200 on these shoes. I request a refund or replacement for the faulty product. I am not satisfied with my experience with Reebok and I wish I had not bought anything from this brand.

Comments

Similar Complaints

Reebok Kids' Shoes Wore Out in 2 Months, Denied Warranty Claim

35

I purchased a pair of Reebok kids' shoes on September 4 through their website. After just two months of use, the shoes s...

My Reebok Shoes Rip After 2 Months

45

I purchased a pair of Reebok shoes that started ripping within 2 months. I don't run or exercise in them, just wear them...

Reebok Shoes Peeling Issue Within Two Months

93

In March, I purchased a pair of Reebok brand sports shoes from the Decathlon store in Bakirkoy Marmara Forum. The front ...

Reebok Shoes Peeling Issue Within Two Months

Reebok Denied My Warranty Claim Despite Quick Heel Damage on New Shoes

30

On July 1, I purchased a pair of Reebok shoes from the Torium store. Even though I used the shoes only for walking, the ...

Reebok Denied My Warranty Claim Despite Quick Heel Damage on New Shoes
Reebok Denied My Warranty Claim Despite Quick Heel Damage on New Shoes