I bought a pair of Reebok Glide Unisex Black sneakers for everyday use. Merely a month post-purchase, the top section of the shoe ripped. I sent the shoes for repair under warranty and paid a total of ₺500 for shipping costs. Yet, the service center declined the shoes and sent them back to me. I spent ₺2200 on these shoes. I request a refund or replacement for the faulty product. I am not satisfied with my experience with Reebok and I wish I had not bought anything from this brand.
I purchased a pair of Reebok kids' shoes on September 4 through their website. After just two months of use, the shoes started to show significant wear and tear. I sent them to FLO under warranty, but the claim was rejected, citing consumer fault. I find it unacceptable that a product costing ₺1,30...
I purchased a pair of Reebok shoes that started ripping within 2 months. I don't run or exercise in them, just wear them casually, but I sent them in for warranty repair. Their response was that there was no manufacturing defect found in the product. I'm baffled as to how a ₺3,000 product can tear a...
I paid 1,500 TL for a pair of Nike Downshifter 12 sports shoes from a store in a mall in Samsun about 3 months ago. However, the shoes developed a tear on the upper part after only 2 months. I took the shoes back to the store for a warranty exchange. They delivered the shoes to the company, but afte...
In March, I purchased a pair of Reebok brand sports shoes from the Decathlon store in Bakirkoy Marmara Forum. The front upper section of the shoes began peeling within two months. I took the product back to the seller, Decathlon, requesting a repair or replacement. The sales representative took a cu...
On July 1, I purchased a pair of Reebok shoes from the Torium store. Even though I used the shoes only for walking, the heel area began to tear in a very short time. I returned the product to the store for inspection and was given the review form with the number 99902000000FD28RJTIT. However, in jus...
Comments