I purchased the Asics Gel-Nimbus 26, expecting premium quality, but the shoe’s left toe area tore at the glue point after just a few uses. This clearly reflects poor manufacturing quality. I promptly contacted the company, returned the defective product, and explained the issue in detail.
Instead of addressing my complaint, the company returned the shoes with a generic letter claiming "user error," which is completely untrue. No investigation or follow-up was conducted. This lack of accountability is unacceptable for a brand like Asics.
I’ve already filed a complaint with the Consumer Arbitration Committee and sent a case report to Asics Japan. Asics, take responsibility for your defective product and resolve this issue properly. Customers deserve better!
I purchased a pair of Asics Gel-Nimbus 26 running shoes about 7 months ago, and I’ve worn them sparingly—only during races and occasional training runs. Despite this limited and careful use, the toe mesh area has already started tearing, and holes have formed in the front part of the shoe. I’ve log...
I’ve now bought the Asics Gel-Nimbus 26 twice, and unbelievably, both pairs tore at the exact same spots after only a few wears. The first pair was from Amazon. Even though the return window had passed, they accepted it back after acknowledging it was a manufacturing defect. Thinking it was just a ...
I purchased the Asics Gel Nimbus 27 running shoes on 23/06/2025, expecting comfort and quality from a globally trusted brand. However, from the very first time I wore them, the shoes caused a painful wound on my big toe. Curious as to why this happened, I closely inspected the area and noticed a vis...
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 26 running shoes I purchased completely fell apart in just one year—and I’m not talking about heavy-duty use. I run around 20K per week, which is considered light to moderate by any standard. What’s frustrating is that Asics promotes this shoe as a top-tier model built for profe...
Comments